The Admiralty Court docket in Ireland just lately deemed if there was jurisdiction to arrest an unregistered pleasure yacht in a dispute relating to ownership. A dispute as to possession is a ´maritime claim´, but below the 1952 Arrest Conference, a ´ship´ must be “traveling the flag” of a State to be inclined to an arrest.
Specified academic writers have interpreted the phrase “Traveling the flag of a contracting State” as denoting a requirement that, for a ship to be susceptible to arrest, it must be registered in a contracting state (or indeed in a “non-contracting” state).
The arresting celebration, even so, argued that “flying the flag of a contracting state” was a prerequisite that a ship had assumed the nationality of a certain state and, in this regard, it was argued, that the flag is a symbol of the ship´s nationality.
The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea offers that ships have the nationality of the State whose flag they are entitled to fly.
That 1982 family law solicitors dublin Convention also gives that it is a issue for each and every specific State to correct the situations for the grant of nationality to ships, the registration of ships in its territory, and, for the proper to fly its flag.
In Ireland, pursuant to the Mercantile Marine Act 1955, a ´ship´ wholly owned by an Irish citizen or entire body corporate, of significantly less than fifty tons, not engaged in trade and navigating only in the waters of Eire and Uk, is exempt from the prerequisite to be registered. Importantly, nonetheless, under the Mercantile Maritime Act 1955, this kind of a ´ship´ is nevertheless considered to be an “Irish Ship”, and, is therefore entitled to fly the Irish flag.
Below the Uk Merchant Transport Act 1995, there are equivalent exemption provisions for registering modest pleasure craft in Uk, which, even so, would be “British Ships” and thus have the proper to fly the British Red Ensign (less than 24 metres).
The substantive problem, which party owned the yacht, would determine the nationality of the yacht, and, no matter whether it family law solicitors dublin was entitled to fly the Irish flag or British ensign. Nevertheless, for the arrest proceedings, the Admiralty Court held that it did not need to have to decide that possession issue because, in both event, the unregistered yacht was a ‘ship’. In both Eire and the United kingdom, the specific unregistered yacht clearly fell inside the exemption requirements to be registered in the two States but would nevertheless nonetheless be regarded as to be a ‘ship’ in possibly State. The pleasure yacht was consequently a ‘ship’ traveling the flag of a contracting state, and, the Admiralty Court held that it experienced jurisdiction to maintain the arrest underneath the 1952 Arrest Conference.
This case would show up to be a single of the very first of its type on the definition of the expression “flying the flag of a contracting state” in 1952 Arrest Convention. This may possibly be stunning, have been it not the fact that each the Irish and British jurisdictions have comfortable guidelines relating to the registration of little vessels.
Lavelle Coleman acted on behalf of the productive arresting get together.
family law solicitors dublin